|
|
Post by tomo on Sept 22, 2017 21:29:37 GMT
on a site I was on seasonal pitches was marked with purple peg and they was the ones they had to use , do they no longer let you choose where your seasonal pitch is , if this is the case I would not be doing it in the future ,as we see the bad places they put them and it has put us off
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorento 08 on Sept 23, 2017 8:30:52 GMT
on a site I was on seasonal pitches was marked with purple peg and they was the ones they had to use , do they no longer let you choose where your seasonal pitch is , if this is the case I would not be doing it in the future ,as we see the bad places they put them and it has put us off I am of the opposite thoughts you have regarding seasonal pitches. I do not see why the seasonal's should be able to take up the best pitches as they are not always fully occupied during the season, so when, say I arrive, for 2 weeks I have to pitch on a not so pretty outlook but paying top prices. Sorry |
|
|
|
Post by tomo on Sept 24, 2017 14:47:00 GMT
good point ,but by the same reasoning why should they get the worst like what was marked out ,when some pay for only 2 weeks a year to be there but they stay for 21 days at a time for which means more than just 2 weeks at top dollar just a thought
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorento 08 on Sept 24, 2017 18:58:37 GMT
I can see both sides but I was trying to give the other side of the coin. It is frustrating to arrive on a site and find that the season pitches are not occupied for the full duration of the short stayer when the short stayer could have enjoyed the outlook given to the empty van. Just a thought, I wonder in the example you gave, the seasonal price is cheaper than that charged to short stayers, so more money is made and the better positions are offered to the non-seasonal.
|
|
